Archive for October, 2007

Now

Tuesday, October 2nd, 2007

Meditation went much better this morning. The usual problem of constant distractions and then, in desperation, I remembered that counting the breaths rather than a mantra is advised by many. It had never appealed to me before, striking me as too cold, methodical and impersonal – the mantra, after all, had meaning although one did not attend to the meaning. The trouble with the mantra is that it is easy to habituate and then you are no better off than before. So I started counting. It worked very well. It kept my attention focused on the breathing and the fact that it was a sequential progression meant that one was less likely to habituate.

Just simply being aware does seem rather a waste of time, especially if what you want to do is pray. Perhaps you want to cry ‘out of the depths’ of anguish, or simply be still in the presence of love, or sing praises filled with awe and wonder. At these times sitting still, leaving thoughts and feelings on one side to simply be aware goes against the grain. But then, on another day there will be no exultant feelings, no tortured anguish, just a dull apathy, heavy with boredom. And you wonder where all the fine thoughts and feelings have gone. Even the pain of suffering almost seems more bearable than this tedium. But you make the effort and you concentrate on counting the breaths and simply being aware.

Later, when you allow yourself to think discursively again, you realise that meditation has distanced you from your thoughts and feelings; that however exhilarating or agonising these feelings were they were not permanent. The only thing you can be absolutely sure of is that they will change and that you have no control over them. Yesterday you may have felt touched by the infinite love at the heart of being, today you may be dull and weepy, tomorrow you may be wracked by suffering. Nothing is fixed, or certain, or permanent. There are no guarantees about the future. It is then that you begin to realise the importance of simple awareness in meditation.

The fact that it distances you from your thoughts and feelings and that it gives you a perspective from which to be aware of them so that you are not caught up in them is immensely valuable. You are no longer their prisoner, one day up, the next day down. You have begun to find the still point.

The various me’s, or selves, are very real. Those of the past – the child of a mother and father, the friend, the lover, the victim etc., are not dead. They reside in memory and it only takes some little trigger – a scent, a sound, a snatch of music – and their powerful feelings and emotions become real and alive again in the present. Once more we are caught up in the world of this former me and the memory is always tinged with sadness. If it was a happy time there is sorrow that it is no more. If it was a sad and bitter time the memory of it floods into the present. Thoughts of, ‘If only…’ and, ‘What if…’ cloud the mind. The past can weigh heavily, a burden that encumbers the present. The secret is to let it go. Only this now is real.

I – me

Monday, October 1st, 2007

The relationship between the I and the me is not as straightforward as Mead makes out. He gives the impression that the I emerges into the present moment from the context of previous me’s, constituted by past events and relationships, and the relationships continuing into the same present moment; that this I is undetermined and in a position to be creative and introduce novelty. My impression is that this is not normally the case; that the I is, more often than not, determined by the present context, what the existentialists would call inauthentic existence. The I in fact is not an I but is subsumed into the me. The person is carried along by the tide of events and relationships accepting the me imposed by the generalised other. In order for the creative I to emerge a space needs to be created between it and the present me. This is usually generated by a crisis, or some crucial event which distances the I, forcing it to examine the present situation, which causes it to stand back, to put things into perspective.

Even then the I may not be in a position to be creative and innovative. It may be too constrained by the pressures and relationships of the moment, it may lack the imaginative resources to break free. Mead fails to take into account the energy generated by these surrounding events and the corresponding inner strength required to abstract from them. This inner strength needs a foundation, a base, a fulcrum from which it can exert itself. This may be a supportive relationship, it may an awareness that one’s being is rooted in Being. One of the advantages of meditation is that it does create this distance. It allows one to see how ephemeral are the shifting events and relationships. It brings into awareness the inner still point, the unmoving (and unchanging?) centre. I am reminded of the Chhandogya Upanishad:

In this body, in this town of Spirit,

there is a little house shaped like a lotus,

and in that house there is a little space.

One should know what is there…

What lies in that space does not decay when the body decays,

nor does it fall when the body falls.

That space is the home of Spirit.

Every desire is there.

Self is there, beyond decay and death.